The Scellier for a tax reduction on investments in rental housing will disappear at the end of the year. Should we still buy them? What do the presidential candidates? Can we really live without it? Our responses.
End of 2012, the exit Scellier, but this time no replacement in sight. Established in 2009, the device-which succeeded other similar laws (Robien Borloo Périssol) – was a tax cut to every purchaser of a new home ready to rent it to nine years. Since 2011, control of public expenditure requires the rate of tax reduction has ceased to be planed. 25% of its creation, it rose from 22% last year to 13% for 2012.
"It is a law in the drawer as the earlier devices, ie that is closed as soon as you need it anymore," says David Charlet, President Anacofi, the National Association of Financial Advisors. This is the case for the government that points two things. First, the device is considered too expensive. The budgetary cost was estimated at 120 million euros for 2010 and 300 million euros in 2011, according to the report of the Finance Committee. An expense that recurs every year over the life of the device.
The other problem is that the investment subsidy has had perverse effects. The Scellier indeed originally applied to all new housing, which led developers to build where the price of land was cheap … even when there was no demand to live there. Hence many business owners in difficulty because of not finding tenants. To try to remedy this, the government has also established a risk map and lowered the rental rent ceilings. Which does today, "about 35% of housing Scellier are located in areas with rental risks," explains Sandrine Levasseur Economist at OFCE.
Are there still bargains in Scellier in 2012?
In this context, the Scellier Offret he still favorable opportunities. Perhaps. But necessarily fewer. "The supply Scellier becoming increasingly rare" recognizes Dacquin Olivier, Director Development and Communications at Heritage Bank and Real Estate. Especially as to maximize returns on their investment, customers must buy a new home BBB (low energy) to qualify for the rate of tax reduction up to 13%. For other units (conventional and intermediate), the reduction rate is lower. " Furthermore, new price caps per square meter to calculate the tax cut were fixed by decree. In the end, "combine an investment in good quality, well positioned, not too expensive to optimize investment in Scellier is a rare commodity." Including zone B1, ie in the center of large cities. "The Scellier is end of life, we are at end of cycle" adds the president of the Anacofi. One thing is certain, this is the last time to enjoy it, but "at the same time he is the coup of buying in a market where demand is non-existent?" he asks.
How the Presidential candidates they planning to offset the end of Scellier?
For now, no candidate has announced equivalent measure for investors, requires fiscal discipline. The revival of the construction is supposed to pass through other means. Francois Hollande proposes to double the ceiling of the booklet A. Objective: collect 15 to 20 billion euros in additional savings to increase the production of social housing. "This is a good measure if the savings is captured in a stable manner, it will automatically give more money to social housing. But social housing is not everything," said M.Charlet. As for the implementation of land disposal of the State, the question is "property that is under the foot and those that can potentially be used in housing" asked the latter. Also on this measure, "if municipalities sell their property, they must still meet there financially," added David Charlet.
For its by Nicolas Sarkozy is proposing to increase by 30% the rights to build, "This will affect the periphery, the effects will be much more limited in dense areas," said Jean-Michel Ciuch, president of consulting Immogroup, a center of analysis and expertise in real estate. He added "this will have an inflationary effect in the short and medium term."
"Thanks to Scellier, the state took the money of the owners, he has not committed" to M.Charlet. "Through measures such as doubling the ceiling of the booklet A, the provision of state property, or increase the building rights, the state wants to regain control," he explains. "But do we have any idea how many new homes can be built without the Scellier?". We can adopt another schema only shown by the public, remains to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Finally, remove the Scellier will result in job supressions several private economic agents in the sector of building and construction.
Can we do without such a device Scellier?
For scholars of management consulting heritage, the answer is unsurprisingly negative. But they advocate "a more effective framework of law strice" coupled "to lower tax benefits," said David Charlet. Jean Michel Ciuch, one thing is certain, even if there are no plans to replace the Scellier, a reflection will certainly incur after the presidential election, because the rental market is an essential key in the overall balance. " It also advocates a better box, but "we need a successor to Scellier," said the CEO of Immogroup, proposing to extend it to the former, a somewhat forgotten market according to him. "This should benefit personal and institutional, "continues Mr Ciuch
. However, no need to" doping ", for Dacquin Olivier, Director of Development and Marketing Heritage Bank and Real Estate. "Look at the market of the former, he is doing very well without Scellier". "By abandoning the Scellier we return to the fundamentals of real estate investment or a long term investment heritage, and not an investment at all costs, only worn by profitability," he concludes.